It was a privilege to attend, and be a reader at, the Mennonite/s Writing VI conference held in Harrisonburg, Virginia this past weekend. What a rich and stimulating event! The schedule was full and there were many concurrent sessions. Here follow some informal notes and observations on the sessions I attended.
Biggest personal takeaway: I was informed and inspired by the presentation of keynote speaker Gregory Orr — “Ethics, Aesthetics and the Lyric.” Orr is a poet, something of a master of the short lyric, and while I don’t write lyric poetry (which can be defined as a poem or song about experience, often involving an “I”, a form omnipresent in history, he said) his words offered much to me also as a writer of fiction. As writer, period. He spoke of the reality of disorder, and the human need for some kind of order. There’s survival value in poetry, he said: “you can and should make a poem.” If you can’t, well someone else has; there’s a “lyric invitation,” and “the classic caress of author and reader.” Orr championed the power of subjectivity to determine beauty, to bestow meaning.
I’m looking forward to reading Orr’s memoir, The Blessing. At Facebook, Shirley Showalter alerted to a guest post by Orr at the blog Narrative, in connection to memoir, and I’m passing on the link as well if you’re interested in his thoughts on the topic above, including references he made in his talk.
Notable quote: “I, I, I is not the same as me, me, me.” The I stands (in, under, against the “over-culture”?), is a position, a naming in one’s own words, calls the other beautiful. The me grasps.
Orr’s presentation dovetailed well — as if they’d planned it, though they hadn’t — with “state of the art” addresses by Ann Hostetler (for the U.S. side of the event) and Hildi Froese Tiessen (for Canada), especially Ann’s on the memoir trend and the “self” in a Mennonite context. Questions both raised included “where does the writing come from,”who is the self in Mennonite garb?”and “to whom or where does the writing go?”
Most electric, stimulating: the theopoetics panel of Peter Dula, Jeff Gundy, Scott Holland, and Jean Janzen. I confess I’d never heard of theopoetics, though we were told that Google references abound, and I can’t say I have enough grasp even after the session to articulate properly what I heard, except to borrow from Jeff Gundy who spoke of it as writing birds instead of birdcages. And, written for “those whose brows sometimes furrow.” But quite apart from the limitations I brought and take away, it was exciting to hear the presentations of the panelists and the brisk, dynamic discussion between them and later with the audience. For the theologian sitting beside me, the best moment was probably Peter Dula’s passionate statement during the discussion that theology isn’t quite as hidebound and rigid – I’m paraphrasing here – as perhaps some of the conversation supposed, but vigorous and beautiful too!
Notable quotes: “The creator God of Genesis is not a moralist but a poet and a potter.” (Scott Holland) “As theopoet I’m not missional.” (Jeff Gundy)
Second best takeaway: One of the best things about any conference such as this is the people – the people I already knew and met again, the people I knew virtually and now met in the flesh, the people I learned to know. I won’t mention names for fear of forgetting someone, but it’s these conversations, lengthy or brief, these exchanges, that will probably stay with me most strongly.
Notable conversation quote (to me): “Yes, yes, you should go to Moscow, see those dachas where the Mennonites gathered in 1929. You should write that story.” Oh, wouldn’t it be wonderful… Going to Moscow, I mean, and seeing those dachas.
Best performance and proof that we’re not running out of stories: What a treat to see Vern Thiessen’s one-man play, “Back to Berlin,” a 40-minute contemporary journey with the narrator, a young man, and his father, back to Berlin, to re-visit some of the sites of the father’s experience as a courier in World War II. It was a father-son encounter both funny and poignant. A lively discussion with the audience followed, in which Thiessen admitted his anxiety over what his father may or may not have “done” on the German side in the war. “That generation is culpable,” he thundered.
In the synthesis panel that closed the conference, a number of people mentioned the “apocalyptic” tone they’d heard in places thoughout the conference, fears about where Mennonite writing was going, whether we’re running out of stories, etc. Panelist Ervin Beck noted this concern but answered it too by saying Thiessen’s work on war/postwar themes was one example of new places to mine creatively. I agree with Beck. I heard enough poems, stories, memoir throughout the conference to indicate there is still plenty of ground to cover – new ground, in fact, no matter whether the “Mennonite” in it is explicit or implicit.
Two scenes, and “drudges”: It was obvious in this conference, as it has been in earlier ones, that the American and Canadian Mennonite writing scenes differ – in their histories, in their questions around ethnicity, identity, church. To generalize (always dangerous, I realize), American Mennonites seem to be flourishing in the areas of poetry and memoir and remain somewhat more connected to the wider Mennonite church, and Canadian Mennonites are flourishing in the areas of fiction and some have moved to a kind of post-Mennonite stage (to borrow Royden Loewen’s expression) as per, say, Miriam Toews or David Bergen. In both the truths of this generalization, and the significant exceptions to it, there remains a need for the conversation and mutual learning such a bi-national conference provides, as well as plenty of ongoing work for the work of the “drudges.” The latter word is not mine, but was used in the synthesis panel to indicate those who support, undergird, shape the entire enterprise. People such as publishers, critics, editors, bibliographers, and so on.
And speaking of critics, Rob Zacharias, a young scholar who is doing some interesting work on Mennonite literature, noted that as we continue to look at the history of Mennonite writing, we should also look at the history of critical work around it. “Who are the Mennonite critics?” he asked. “Why are they interested in these texts?” Critics, he noted, are also trading in “Mennonite currency.” A good point, I think.
Most startling good book/author discovery: In an earlier version of the schedule, Stephen Raleigh Byler, author of Searching for Intruders, was slotted with me and Rudy Wiebe, so I ordered his book to acquaint myself a little with his work before meeting him. Unfortunately, he was not able to attend the conference after all, but I’m hooked on the book, about two-thirds done. It’s grim, it’s dark, but this is fine, fine writing. I also appreciated hearing a paper by Erwin Beck at the conference, “Searching for Intruders revisited,” which is informing my reading of Byler’s novel.
And my reading? Yes, it went well; thanks for asking. 🙂 It was a great honor to read alongside Rudy Wiebe, who has been so influential on the Canadian Mennonite literary scene, and to me personally through his work, his example and encouragements. He read from his story “Broken Arrow,” in his Collected Stories, and a number of times his voice seemed to break, not from age, I thought, but because of the power and witness of the words. Interesting how what is set down and then let go of has that power, not just for the reader, but also for the author who is reader. A gift turning back to bless the giver.
Session I wish I could hear again: the opening evening of poetry by Todd Davis, Jeff Gundy, Julia Spicher Kasdorf, and Keith Ratzlaff. I’d been up since before five that morning, Manitoba time, and I was dismally tired. I sat there and their poems washed over me like the gift of a long hot shower, but I wasn’t catching anything besides how good it felt. I’d wish to hear again, and catch.
Freshest: I slept between sheets, pillowcases, and coverlet that were moss colored, as if the spring blossoms and loveliness of the Eastern Mennonite University campus weren’t enough to remind me I’d come into a green place, and woke to begin Friday’s day of conferencing with “Visual and Popular Culture” – a session on cooking, Amish quilts, film in Irma Voth, and the Amish romance novel. Each paper was delightfully fresh with insights and information.
And fresh again, closer to the end: readings in a session titled “Life Writing and Healing,” especially Connie Braun’s poems and Jessica Penner’s autobiographical essay “Mustard Seed.”
Notable quote: Silence is passed on. “I took away… so many questions.” (Connie Braun)
Sorry to Miss, A Disappointment, and The Travel Bracket (a.k.a, this post is getting too long and it’s time to wrap it up): I was sorry to miss the final conference “Words and Worship Celebration” Sunday morning because of flight requirements, but I’m borrowing this from the conference report:
Speaking at the final event, a service marking Palm Sunday, [Rudy] Wiebe touched on the way writers work in silence, enveloped in the mystery of writing. Yet when writers and readers meet, their “mutual silences open to listening.”
I was disappointed, for her sake, that attendance for Carol Ann Weaver’s American premiere of “Paraguay Primeval” was so sparse. I know it was nothing personal, and no reflection on the really interesting work Weaver does, just the late-evening slot at the end of a very full conference. Sometimes these things can’t be helped, but a disappointment, nevertheless.
And the travel bracket? Two days both ways, actually, in the company of Paul Doerksen, professor at Canadian Mennonite University. I came to know him first as the history and Bible teacher of our children at their high school and in numerous connections since. The conversations were good, on a range of things churchly and cultural, as well as debriefing the conference. And – huge relief to me – he was willing to drive the rental car. I helped by holding the GPS.
[Should any participants of the conference read this report of “my” Mennonite/s Writing VI conference and notice errors, please comment to correct me. April 8 note: I did a few edits on the post, per a note from Ann Hostetler; thanks!]
Beautiful summary Dora… Thanks for sharing this. It was such a pleasure to connect with you and hear your work. Stunning to say the least. 🙂
Thanks Katie, it was a pleasure for me as well, and to now be aware of your fascinating project and blog. I love lemon pie, by the way!
Thanks, Dora. Good to experience the gathering vicariously via reports like yours.
And leaving, we drove by MennoMedia in your honor, Byron!
Dora, I’ve shared this wonderful post at my own ShirleyHersheyShowalter FB page and on the Center for Mennonite Writing FB page (highiy recommended resource to those readers especially interested in Mennonite Writing). Your description of the Orr talk, combined with the link to Richard Gilbert’s blog where Orr does a guest post, gives writers much food for thought. And you will want to get a copy of Rudy Wiebe’s sermon and Julia Kasdorf’s concluding remarks.
What fun that you and Katie connected. I am beginning to see my virtual worlds and real worlds unite in places like this conference. Wonderful.
Isn’t that true, about worlds connecting! I loved the optimism you shared in your remarks on the synthesis panel — your statement there that “individual consciousness can lead to new forms of community.” Katie and I met the first evening at the snack corner, both needing something to eat. — Do you know how one can get a copy of the sermon and concluding remarks?
According to an email from Kirsten Beachy, all presenters should submit their papers and readings to her and then three different journals will divide up what they want to publish. I’m sure that the sermon will be published. Not as sure about Julia’s brief remarks are the end. But they were powerful.
Thanks, Shirley. I do hope I can see it sometime. The seven words, as per your tweet, intrigue me, as does your brief summary of Julia’s challenge, to move past transgression and rejection. — BTW, I wanted to include so much more in my post and don’t know how I missed the memoir session, because it was really outstanding, all three of you: Raylene Hinz-Penner’s evocation of the land, especially the wind; Levi Miller’s amazing detail about 1961; your story about your relationship with your father. — All in all, such a great conference.
Dora, I really enjoyed reading about your experience at Mennonite/s Writing VI conference. It brought back some great memories of several years ago when I attended and presented a paper. I too was struck at that time by the difference between the Canadian Mennonite writing scene and that of the American. You have summarized it well.
It was a delight and an inspiration to read Orr’s comments on the writing of memoirs . Thanks for that
Thanks Elfrieda! I got Orr’s memoir from the library today and can hardly wait for the weekend to get into it!
This sounds like it was a very rich event. I wish I could have heard the poetry session!
I know you would have enjoyed it Joanne. Maybe next round, wherever it will be!
Dora, thank you for this gracious post with its detail and coverage of so many of the conference events. With all of the concurrent sessions at the conference, even a diligent attender could only take in about 1/4 to 1/3 of the offerings. Some of those you’ve mentioned here I missed–the Theopoetics, Life Writing and Healing, and Visual and Popular Culture sessions–so I am especially glad to get a review of them through your eyes. I was fortunate to hear you read with Rudy–a powerful pairing of writers and stories that engage historical moments and characters with deep compassion. I was also fortunate to hear Carol Ann and Rebecca perform “Paraguayan Primeval”–its was late and I was exhausted, but I am so grateful that I went to hear these haunting and beautiful texts and music. (I will now look up your book on Paraguay–one of the new places I learned to know through art in the Virginia hills was Paraguay, through Carol’s music and Katherine Arnoldi’s reading, both of which used effective slide presentations. There seem to be worlds within worlds at a Mennonite literature conference.)What a feast! I’m already looking forward to reading the many papers in print that I missed the first time around. They will appear in MQR, CGR, and JCMW–the latter issue is scheduled for July 15 publication. I believe that Rudy’s sermon will be published, as will Julia’s closing remarks, in one of these places.
Thanks, Ann! Worlds within worlds: wonderful description. Glad to know too that we will be able to re-visit many of the papers in print.
In the early eighties, I had a project which took some time in South America and decided to visit some relatives in Bolivia and Paraguay. The most recent colonizers then were Sommerfelder and Bergthaler Mennonites originating in Southern Saskatchewan, Canada where my Mother grew up. It was a fascinating journey as I learned the use of horsedrawn buggies and the scythe for harvesting, but also made rhymes with religous themes, or theopoetry to help some of my cousins who wanted to learn some English.
After that, i made my way to Tierra Del Fuego at the Southern tip of South America and hitch-hiked back to Canada, again visiting Mennonite colonies enroute.
Thanks, Dan, for sharing your version of theopoetics!
Hi Doradueck. I was in an accident that year and couldn’t attend. But I read a few months ago at Penn State from a a memoir in progress.
Hi Stephen, good to hear from you. I think you were scheduled to read with Rudy W. and me; so sorry you couldn’t make it. BTW, I read your Searching for Intruders; thought it an amazing achievement. All the best in the memoir. Please let me know when it’s published.