December’s great big decision

This week — between Christmas and New Year’s and a few days beyond – can be anticlimactic after packed and people-full holiday events, can even be, as someone on Twitter once remarked, “strange and timeless and heavy with depression and restlessness,” but that’s not the case for me this year. On the contrary, it seems among the loveliest of weeks. There’s a sense of fulfilment in what’s just happened and no particular obligation left, while the tree twinkles still with its lights and special ornaments, the poinsettia carries on with its remarkably radiant red, and there are leftovers to eat. Even for someone who’s semi-retired, there’s an impression of extra permission in the air: do what you want.

This airiness, this possibility, threads me back to such weeks in my childhood, when the main events of Christmas were done but we had more days free of school and did a puzzle, played games, read for hours, skated. Oh how we skated! Round and round and round the rink, in the bliss of the crisp outdoors and the ecstatic glide of blades on ice.

This week I have a puzzle spread out, and enough to read. I’m thinking about the past and the future. Not exactly making resolutions but assessing. Playing with images of Spirit. (“I take refuge in the shadow of your wings” Ps.57:1) Considering the multiple conflicts and sadnesses in the world.

IMG_3770

And then there’s December’s great big decision (don’t laugh): next year’s journal. I’ve done large notebooks, Moleskines and knockoffs, in-between sizes. I’m fussy by now: the paper has to be quality so it doesn’t bleed through with ink on both sides, it has to be narrowly lined. (I’ve also tried unlined.)

I liked this year’s journal book, but can’t find another like it. I have something close though am wary of the coil binding going wonky on me.

At the juncture of a new notebook, I brood about my journaling practice too. Should I go for diary-like, or intermittent random thoughts? How about one of those one-line-a-day attempts? Sounds like a fun challenge but might be like handcuffs for a writer. Gratitude and grump, or just gratitude?

In In The Jaws of the Black Dogs, John Bentley Mays judged his Aunt Candalia’s diaries as “performances of dread, a stalling of death… an attempt to ground herself, if on no more solid ground than the shifting site of writing….”

Mays’ critique stings, for yes, the journals/diaries certainly add up to “the suffocating intimacy of details” over the years, but then again, if I hadn’t noted these quotes when reading his book back in 2007, could I have used them here? At any rate, the new year approaches and I’ve got an (almost decided upon) notebook waiting as pristine and empty as a field of new snow, ready for the first foot marks of the first day to be written over it.

IMG_3768

I wish you all a good new year, friends, however you live and mark your field of days. May you be blessed!

Eating at IKEA and Eating Like a Mennonite

I stopped at IKEA for a few things recently and since it was close to noon, had lunch in their dining room. As usual, I had the Swedish-meatballs-mashed-potatoes-vegetables-and-dab-of- lingonberries plate and a triangle of DAIM cake for dessert.

IMG_3702

As usual, I say, because this is the very thing Helmut and I ate on our numerous trips to IKEA after re-locating to B.C., when we needed bookshelves, and then more bookshelves, and end tables, and so on and on. Although we brought some furniture along, we had left a good deal behind as well, and now we re-furnished as if we were students starting out — as cheaply and easily as possible! 

So I have good memories of those meals and if I happen to eat at IKEA now, I find myself making the same selection as before. It’s tasty enough, though IKEA-mass-produced, and I’m not sure what makes the meatballs Swedish, but it’s a meal of comfort for me on account of remembering those earlier times.

61SLqzKq6yL._SY522_

A few days later, I attended the launch in Abbotsford of Marlene Epp’s new book, Eating Like a Mennonite: Food and Community across Borders. Marlene Epp is professor emeritus of history at Conrad Grebel University in Waterloo, Ont. and well-known for her book, Women without Men: Mennonite Refugees of the Second World War (2000). She brings the same careful analysis, research, and skill with anecdotes to the topic of food: its role in identity, how what it “is” shifts through migration and encounters with other foodways (“hybridity”), how recipes are passed on, “the complex terrain of food and gender,” food trauma, and the place of food in religious practice. 

These topics play out in other groups as well, of course, but Epp’s focus is Mennonites (world-wide) and because I happen to be Mennonite, her book has been of great interest to me. As I read I couldn’t help inserting my experiences with food into her analysis. When she speaks of “the symbolic capacity of food to contain the past,” true for persons as well as communities, there was the recent repeat selection of a memory-laden meal at IKEA as an example. In fact, it is often food — his favourites or my making of Paraguayan chipa, which was his “specialty” and job — that evokes bittersweet recollections of him.

IMG_5562

Epp writes a fascinating chapter on cookbooks. She also addresses presumptions about Mennonite women as good cooks, as seen in the Mennonite Girls Can Cook blog phenomenon, for example. It was the MGCC phenomenon that prompted some writer friends of mine to propose, some years ago, an anthology around the idea that Mennonite Girls Can Write (about Food). Although the project didn’t happen, it inspired me to look at my life through the lens of food, written into something I called “Notes toward an autobiography,” though told in the third person, which landed in Return Stroke: essays & memoir. In that piece I had to start with the truth that though I admired and wished to emulate my mother, she was not a particularly good cook. (It occurs to me that because of that, I tried harder, even though I too am more dutiful than fond when it comes to meal preparation.) 

When I read a section about my experience with cookbooks at a launch of my book, I was surprised how much laughter it elicited. But it’s true, there’s often great seriousness about food, and there’s trauma in histories or presence of hunger, but looking back, laughter as well.

…She began with the cookbooks of her own tradition: The Mennonite Treasury of Recipes and The Mennonite Community Cookbook. She put eager comments in the margins when something turned out well: Aug.24/75 With our own apples! Yummy, and my first platz! Later she added, Also nice with rhubarb.

In time it annoyed her that most of the women who’d submitted the recipes identified themselves through their husbands — they were Mrs Jake Krahns, for instance, or Mrs Sam Detweilers — but well before that she was frustrated by their all-knowing vagueness. They left out baking times and other vital information. They said things like “enough flour for a firm dough.” What was a firm dough compared to a soft one?

Betty Crocker saved her. In Betty Crocker’s cookbook, no one cared about Mr Crocker’s name, or whether Betty was even married, or if she went to church. The language was English, the ingredients available in any regular store. The amounts were precise. Every single step was explained. The recipes succeeded. With Betty as her guide, she learned to make cream puffs, tall elegant cakes, pudding from scratch, strogonoff, and turkey pie. She hung on to that cookbook long after its cover had torn off and its pages were ruined with grease and gobs of batter. Long after her dependency on Betty Crocker had ended, she loved Betty’s book best.

Marlene Epp’s book would make a great selection for a book club, though the discussion of all the angles she pursues and their significant considerations around food might well devolve into an evening of personal stories (as has happened here in this post) and likely a fair bit of laughter. At any rate, I enjoyed Marlene’s book and recommend it.

sc009b2db3

But last of all this, who knew that watermelons were such a “marker” of food identity for Mennonites? And that there are various ways to cut them — neatly or for slurp effect? When we lived in Paraguay, where watermelons were plentiful in season, our young sons tackled theirs outside and with spoons! 

Stories and songs

I forgot my phone at Bonnie’s house yesterday so have no photos to prove I attended the second day of the Russlaender conference! But I was definitely there, at my alma mater, the University of Winnipeg, for a day as rich as the first. It felt less compressed, because there were only three presentations per slot instead of four as had been the case during parts of in the day before. Once again, there was much of interest.

It struck me that though an academic conference, many participants and certainly many in the audience had their own stories and lineage to set into what they were hearing about the period under consideration: the emigration of some 20,000 Mennonites from Russia in the 1920s. For one example, Josephine Braun, a great-grand-daughter of Isaac J Braun of the somewhat notorious Friesen-Braun trial in Saskatchewan, presented her attempts to dig deeper into the life of a man whose story had been suppressed within her own family, as Braun was jailed for some five years and then deported back to Russia, with his wife and sons left behind to somehow manage in Canada. A fascinating story with much remaining mystery.

The question at the time of that decade in Russia was: leave or stay? In another paper I particularly enjoyed, on Friday, Colin Neufeldt presented a long list of reasons people had NOT to emigrate. Some 20,000 did, yes, and it was that decision and the reasons for it as well as subsequent immigrant adjustments to a new environment that these days are commemorating, but the large majority did not leave. Some wanted to but couldn’t for various reasons and others could have but didn’t, also for various reasons. Many, perhaps more than we realize, he suggested, wanted to participate in the creation of the world’s first socialist state. For those less privileged within the Mennonite community, there was the possibility of upward mobility in the new circumstances. Also, the New Economic Policy seemed for many an optimistic reconstructive step after the chaos of the civil war. And of course there were always family reasons: one member of a couple might wish to go but not the other, or there were elderly parents to consider and so on.

Last week, before coming, I happened to be looking at some pages of my grandmother Helene Derksen Harder’s diary, where she recounts in broad strokes the last years and months before their decision to leave and then the auction and flurry with papers/permissions and other preparations for the journey. She tells of instances of great fear as “guests”–her euphemism for bandits and soldiers–invaded the household, wanting food, horses, money, and so on. She tells of hunger, loss, tension, deprivation. She mentions the bravery of her old mother who helped them pack, realizing she might never see her daughter again. Now I want to search those pages more thoroughly for my grandparents’ particular motivation to leave–along with their three small children—their beloved homeland and parents for new and unknown future.

As mentioned already, it was the decision to leave, whatever the motivation, that the conference (as well as a train tour from Quebec City to Abbotsford these weeks) was commemorating and for me the most wonderful way to do it was yesterday evening’s Saengerfest. Choirs–adult, youth, children–singing songs old and new, and we in the “sold out” Centennial Concert Hall sometimes got to sing along too. It’s songs of lament and faith and hope that reach back to connect both the stayers and the leavers, that sustained those who suffered through the challenges of their decisions; it’s the songs that now mostly strongly connect me into that story and my heritage and into my own childhood and youth, that brought me to tears last evening.

IMG_2432

I’ll end with mentioning just one small part of the festival of song. In Bach’s “Befiehl du deine Wege” (Entrust Thy Ways), conductor Henry Engbrecht had the choir begin each line together and then sing it individually, however slowly or quickly, and then at his signal end in harmony on the final note. It was the strangest and most astonishing cacophony of sound and then resolution, a perfect demonstration of the hundreds of individual stories we each set against the backdrop of historical events but drawing together as community then, as we hear one another, in harmony.